Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 135

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

22 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed “Ordinary Soil Mining Project” at Gata No. 58, 81/1Mi, 81/1, 81/2, 81/4, 82/1 & 82/3 in…
19 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed “Ordinary Soil Mining Project” at Gata 38, 122, 125, 76, 156, 157, 160, 163, 164, 173 & 200 in…
18 Oct 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance granted“Ordinary Soil Excavation Project” at Gata No.¬ 935, 941, 949, 1080ड and total area 1.6022 Ha., located in…
10 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtEnvironmental Clearance of Expansion of existing Sugar Unit from 8000 TCD to 10000 TCD and co-gen power…
8 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmitted“Ordinary Soil Mining” Project at Ga ta No.- 1232, 1293, Village-Bela, Tehsil- Sambhal, District- Sambhal,…
6 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed “Ordinary Soil Mining Project” at Gata 311/1, 315, 316, 317, 318, 322Mi & 323 in Village- Shahpur…
30 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedExpansion of Existing 300 KLPD B-Heavy Molasses/ Cane Juice/ Grain Based Distillery to 600 KLPD Cane…
29 Sept 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedDevelopment of High Speed Access Controlled Corridor from Shamli - Gorakhpur (Phase-I) in the state of…
25 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedEnvironmental clearance of proposed ordinary soil mining at Gata Nos. 204, 273, 299MI, 308MI Area-1.218 at…
23 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedSMT. SANTOSH SAGAR
21 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedEnvironmental Clearance of Expansion of existing Sugar Unit from 8000 TCD to 10000 TCD and co-gen power…
18 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed Township and area development Sahyadri Residential Scheme Pocket -A at Village – Sonakpur, Tehsil…

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 4
Forest land sought for diversion: Area not stated
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 0
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 144 of 144 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 47 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 144
Category A proposals: 10
Families declared displaced: 72
Families declared affected: 90

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited. 1 of the proposals listed below declare displacement and are sited primarily in another district, so their figures are counted in that district’s total.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Uttar Pradesh, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

Literacy was 56.8% in 2011 against 72.98% nationally, so notices and documents issued in writing during a consultation may reach fewer people here.
Applicants for projects sited mainly in this district have declared 72 families to be displaced. The figure comes from their applications, and we have not verified it.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 47,72,006
Households: 7,96,170
Average household size: 5.99; 1.14 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 0.0%; 8.5 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 15.3%; 1.3 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 16.4%; 2.8 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 56.8%; 16.2 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 906; 36.2 below India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 14,17,811
Work participation rate: 29.7%; 10.1 points below IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 49.9%; 4.7 points below IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 26.0%; 1.4 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 23.9%; 6.1 points below IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 22.1%; 2.7 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 6.3%; 2.4 points above IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 46.5%; 0.3 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 31.5%; 7.2 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 53.6%; 1.8 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 8.2%; 0.1 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q12026-Q4

The timeline counts 104 of the 144 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 40, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 79.2%
Industrial Projects - 2 11.8%
INFRA-2 4.2%
INFRA-1 3.5%
Other (1) 1.4%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 144 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 144 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from uttar-pradesh.json and uttarakhand.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.