Ramban, Jammu & Kashmir

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 17

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

26 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtMinor Mineral Block Gypsum Mining at Village – Sumerbogh Hodog (Pralanka), District-Ramban, J&K in favour…
23 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtMaitra Gypsum Mine
26 Sept 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtMinor Mineral Block Gypsum Mining at Village – Sumerbogh Hodog (Pralanka), District-Ramban, J&K in favour…
18 Sept 2026 · ClosedDelisted automaticallyMinor Mineral Block Gypsum Mining at Village – Sumerbogh Hodog (Pralanka), District-Ramban, J&K in favour…

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 0
Forest land sought for diversion: None declared
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 0
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 7 of 7 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 7 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 7
Category A proposals: 2
Families declared displaced: 2,954
Families declared affected: 2,954

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Jammu & Kashmir, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply. A different protection does apply here: State land and forest-rights law; no Presidential Order under the Fifth Schedule extends here.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

Literacy was 54.3% in 2011 against 72.98% nationally, so notices and documents issued in writing during a consultation may reach fewer people here.
Applicants for projects sited mainly in this district have declared 2,954 families to be displaced. The figure comes from their applications, and we have not verified it.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 2,83,713
Households: 55,490
Average household size: 5.11; 0.26 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 14.0%; 5.5 points above IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 4.9%; 11.7 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 19.4%; 5.8 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 54.3%; 18.7 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 902; 40.2 below India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 87,212
Work participation rate: 30.7%; 9.0 points below IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 57.6%; 3.0 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 47.5%; 22.8 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 10.1%; 19.8 points below IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 40.3%; 15.6 points above IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 2.9%; 0.9 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 93.2%; 47.1 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 18.1%; 6.3 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 33.2%; 18.6 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 15.3%; 7.1 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q42026-Q3

The timeline counts all 7 proposals here, since each one records the date it was first filed.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 71.4%
River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects 28.6%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

All 7 proposals that name this district, newest first.

Showing the first 7 of 7 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from jammu-and-kashmir.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.