Banda, Uttar Pradesh

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 170

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

27 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details sought“Sand/Morrum Mining” at Gata No. Part of 5, Part of 9, Village– Bilharka, Tehsil- Naraini, District-…
27 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details sought“Sand/Morrum Mining” from Riverbed of Ken River Village- Marauli khadar, Gata No.- Part of 333/7 (Khand…
27 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details sought“Sand/Morrum Mining Project” located at Gata No. Part of 1141, 1137, 1136, 1123/2, 1125, 1127, 1131 &…
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmitted“Morrum Mining” at Village- Manpur Khurd, Gata No.- 165, 164, Lease Area- 1.7500 Ha. (private agricultural…
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmitted“Morrum Mining” at Village- Lahureta, Gata No.- 549, 551, 549MI, Lease Area- 1.1080 Ha. (private…
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmitted“Sand/Morrum Mine” from Riverbed of Ken River, Village- Maraulikhadar, Gata No.- Part of 333/7, 418, 421…
21 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details sought“Sand/ Morrum Mining” from Riverbed of ken River at Village- Kanwara, Gata No.- 28/1, 28/5, 28/6, 28/7, 29…
21 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtProposed “Sand/Morrum Mining Project” located at Gata No. Part of 356 (Khand- 01), Total Area- 16 Ha.,…
21 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed riverbed sand/morrum mining project from Yamuna River of M/s Pehalwan Develpers Pvt. Ltd.…
19 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedEnvironmental clearance of Morrum removal from Bhumidhari/ Agricultural land/ Private land at Gata No.-…
18 Oct 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance grantedSand/Morrum Mining Project at Gata No. 04, lease area of 10.00 hectares ,Village – Kolawal Raipur, Tehsil…
18 Oct 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedRiver Bed Sand/Morrum Mining having lease area 24.0 ha (59.30 acre) along River Ken in Gata No. 678,…

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 3
Forest land sought for diversion: 7 ha
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 0
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 219 of 219 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 92 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 219
Category A proposals: None
Families declared displaced: 206
Families declared affected: 10,000

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Uttar Pradesh, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

Applicants for projects sited mainly in this district have declared 206 families to be displaced. The figure comes from their applications, and we have not verified it.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 17,99,410
Households: 3,19,963
Average household size: 5.62; 0.77 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 0.0%; 8.5 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 21.6%; 4.9 points above IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 16.4%; 2.8 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 66.7%; 6.3 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 863; 79.6 below India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 7,01,689
Work participation rate: 39.0%; 0.8 points below IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 74.9%; 20.3 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 35.9%; 11.3 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 39.0%; 9.0 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 31.1%; 6.4 points above IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 2.7%; 1.1 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 46.6%; 0.5 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 17.8%; 6.6 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 52.7%; 0.9 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 3.5%; 4.8 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q12026-Q4

The timeline counts 175 of the 219 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 44, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 97.3%
INFRA-2 1.4%
River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects 1.4%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 219 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 219 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from uttar-pradesh.json and madhya-pradesh.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.