Siddharth Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
Recent activity
All 0 in the last 60 daysNo proposal naming this district recorded a step between 30 Aug 2026 and 28 Oct 2026.
Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.
Other clearances these proposals declare
- Forest land diversion declared
- 0
- Forest land sought for diversion
- None declared
- Wildlife board recommendation declared
- 0
- In or near a protected area
- 0
- In an eco-sensitive zone
- 0
These counts are taken from the application forms of the 6 of 6 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 1 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.
- Proposals naming this district
- 6
- Category A proposals
- None
- Families declared displaced
- None declared
- Families declared affected
- None declared
Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.
Fifth Schedule status
Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area
No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Uttar Pradesh, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.
OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution
What the record shows
Cultivators and agricultural labourers make up 79% of workers here, against 55% nationally, so at least three in four people who work here do so on the land.
Agricultural labourers, who work other people's land for wages, make up 45% of workers here. Compensation for acquired land is paid to those who hold title to it, so it does not reach them. They can still claim the rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR), because its section 3(c) counts a family whose livelihood depends on the land as an affected family, wherever that Act governs how the land is obtained.
Literacy was 59.3% in 2011 against 72.98% nationally, so notices and documents issued in writing during a consultation may reach fewer people here.
Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.
Who lives there
Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.
- Total population
- 25,59,297
- Households
- 3,79,351
- Average household size
- 6.75
- 1.90 above India's 4.85India
- Scheduled Tribe share of population
- 0.5%
- 8.1 points below IndiaIndia
- Scheduled Caste share of population
- 16.0%
- 0.7 points below IndiaIndia
- Children aged 0-6
- 19.0%
- 5.4 points above IndiaIndia
- Literacy rate
- 59.3%
- 13.7 points below IndiaIndia
- Sex ratio
- 976
- 33.5 above India's 942.6India
What they live on
How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.
- Total workers
- 8,78,898
- Work participation rate
- 34.3%
- 5.4 points below IndiaIndia
- Workers dependent on land
- 79.0%
- 24.4 points above IndiaIndia
- Cultivators
- 34.0%
- 9.3 points above IndiaIndia
- Agricultural labourers
- 45.1%
- 15.1 points above IndiaIndia
- Marginal workers
- 49.0%
- 24.3 points above IndiaIndia
- Household industry workers
- 4.1%
- 0.3 points above IndiaIndia
How households live
Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.
- Rural households owning land
- 67.5%
- 21.4 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
- 26.9%
- 2.6 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
- 41.5%
- 10.3 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households with a salaried member
- 4.0%
- 4.3 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
When these were filed
Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.
The timeline counts 3 of the 6 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 3, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.
Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones.
What kind of projects these are
The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.
- Non-Coal Mining 83.3%
- INFRA-2 16.7%
The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.
What is proposed here
These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.
- Category B2EC Granted2025-04-25
Proposed Project of “Ordinary Sand Mine (Category-1)” Gata No.- 259ग, 258ग, 258खं over an area of 2.320 Hectares Village –Chivarhiya, Tehsil –Naugarh, District- Siddharth Nagar (U.P.)Proponent- Shri Rakesh Singh,Area-2.320 Hectares.
rakesh singh · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2EC Granted2025-04-11
“Ordinary Sand Mining” from Riverbed of Ban Ganga River at Village- Golhaura Ehatmali, Gata No.- 192 ka, Lease Area- 5.00 ha., Tehsil- Shohratgarh, District- Siddharth Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, Project Proponent- Siraj Ahamad
SERAJ AHMAD · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2EC Granted2025-02-14
proposed “Ordinary Sand Mining Project” at Gata No. – 192, (Total area 3.0000 Ha.) located in village/ghat – Dadhaul, tehsil- Shohratgarh, district- Siddharth Nagar (U.P.). M/s Krishi Sewa Kendra Prop. Shri Kuldeep Mishra.
kuldeep mishra · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2EC Granted2023-03-06
Riverbed Ordinary Sand mine, Village- Khadkuiya Nankar (Gata/Araji No.- 979 Ja, lease area- 3.160 ha.), Tehsil- Shohratgarh, District- Siddharthnagar, U.P.
ANJANI KUMAR · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B1EC Granted2022-11-18
Proposed Common Biomedical Waste Management Facility, Itwa, Siddharth Nagar, Uttar Pradesh
DINESH SINGH · INFRA-2
- Category B2EC Granted2022-09-21
Ordinary Sand Mining Project on Kura River
KABIR NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED · Non-Coal Mining
All 6 proposals that name this district, newest first.