← All districts

Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 189

No proposal naming this district recorded a step between 30 Aug 2026 and 28 Oct 2026.

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared
2
Forest land sought for diversion
Area not stated
Wildlife board recommendation declared
0
In or near a protected area
0
In an eco-sensitive zone
0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 10 of 10 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 4 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district
10
Category A proposals
5
Families declared displaced
452
Families declared affected
452

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited. 3 of the proposals listed below declare displacement and are sited primarily in another district, so their figures are counted in that district’s total.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Uttar Pradesh, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

  • Agricultural labourers, who work other people's land for wages, make up 47% of workers here. Compensation for acquired land is paid to those who hold title to it, so it does not reach them. They can still claim the rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR), because its section 3(c) counts a family whose livelihood depends on the land as an affected family, wherever that Act governs how the land is obtained.

  • Applicants for projects sited mainly in this district have declared 452 families to be displaced. The figure comes from their applications, and we have not verified it.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population
35,64,544
Households
5,61,062
Average household size
6.35
1.50 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population
2.3%
6.3 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population
15.3%
1.4 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6
16.0%
2.4 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate
65.3%
7.7 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio
961
18.0 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers
11,16,973
Work participation rate
31.3%
8.4 points below IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land
71.1%
16.5 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators
23.8%
0.8 points below IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers
47.3%
17.4 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers
53.2%
28.4 points above IndiaIndia
Household industry workers
5.1%
1.3 points above IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land
75.6%
29.5 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
31.4%
7.1 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
60.3%
8.5 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households with a salaried member
6.1%
2.2 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q12026-Q1

The timeline counts 7 of the 10 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 3, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

  • INFRA-1 50%
  • INFRA-2 20%
  • Industrial Projects - 2 20%
  • Non-Coal Mining 10%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

  1. Category AProposal returned in present form2026-03-03

    Development of Gorakhpur Siliguri High Speed Access Controlled Corridor UP Section starting from Gorakhpur Bypass km 0.000 (near Nayapura Khurd) to km 86.680 (near Ghaghawa Jagdish Ahatmali) in the State of Uttar Pradesh (Total Length = 86.680 km).

    NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA · INFRA-1

  2. Category AEC Granted2026-02-09declares affected families

    Development of Newly declared NH-727AA to 2/4- Lane Standard Highway from Bettiah on NH-727 connecting Patzirwa, Paknaha in the state of Bihar, Pipraghat and terminate at Sewrahi Jn. with NH- 730 in the State of Uttar Pradesh

    Ram MOHAN singh · INFRA-1

  3. Category AProposal pulled back (withdrawn)2025-09-05declares affected families

    Development of 6 lane with PS Gorakhpur Siliguri High Speed Access Controlled corridor starting from Gorakhpur Bypass km 0.000 (near Madapur) to km 525.590 (on NH-327 near Bagdogra) at Deomani in the states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and West Bengal (Total Length = 525.590 km)

    NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA · INFRA-1

  4. Category AEC Granted2025-07-28declares affected families

    Development of Newly declared NH-727AA to 2/4- Lane Standard Highway from Bettiah on NH-727 connecting Patzirwa, Paknaha in the state of Bihar, Pipraghat and terminate at Sewrahi Jn. with NH- 730 in the State of Uttar Pradesh

    Ram MOHAN singh · INFRA-1

  5. Category AToR Granted2024-08-31declares affected families

    Development of Newly declared NH-727AA to 2/4- Lane Standard Highway from Bettiah on NH-727 connecting Patzirwa, Paknaha in the state of Bihar, Pipraghat and terminate at Sewrahi Jn. with NH- 730 in the State of Uttar Pradesh

    Ram MOHAN singh · INFRA-1

  6. Category B2EC Granted2024-06-26

    Environmental clearance for Construction of Mahatma Buddh Technical & Agricultural University at Kushinagar, U.P., India On EPC Mode.

    SHYAM SUNDAR SINGH · INFRA-2

  7. Category B2EC Granted2024-02-21

    Construction of New District Jail (Capacity 1026) at Padrauna, District Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh by Superintendent of District Jail, Deoria

    RAJ VERMA · INFRA-2

  8. Category B1EC Granted2023-11-16

    M/s. Ramaya Distilleries & Bottlers Pvt. Ltd.

    RAMAYA DISTILLERIES AND BOTTLERS PRIVATE LIMITED · Industrial Projects - 2

  9. Category B1EC Granted2023-08-29

    Expansion of Sugar Mill (5000 TCD to 12000 TCD) along with Co-generation Power Plant (6 MW to 15 MW) At Village Sewrahi, Block & Post Office Seorahi, Tehsil Tamkuhi Raj, District Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh by M/s. The United Provinces Sugar Company Limited

    THE UNITED PROVINCES SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED · Industrial Projects - 2

  10. Category B2EC Granted2023-05-06

    Ordinary Sand Mining Project

    PAWAN YADAV · Non-Coal Mining

All 10 proposals that name this district, newest first.