Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 199

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

27 Oct 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance granted“Building Stone,Sand Stone Qurtizite Ballast Gitti Mining” at Village- Dhuriya, Arazi/Gata No.- 428, Lease…
27 Oct 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedSANDSTONE, QUARTZITE BALLAST GITTI MINE PROJECT
23 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedArea- 1.01 Ha Building Stone(Sandstone)Gitti. Boulder PatiyaMining Project Araji no. 428, Village-Dhuriya,…
17 Oct 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedProposed Project of Sand Stone Quartizite Ballast Gitti Mining Project at Gata no. 283Kha, Area 2.54 ha in…
14 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtProposed Expansion of Existing Unit From 96 TPD To 700 TPD MS Billets Through Induction Furnace along with…
13 Oct 2026 · ClosedReturned in its present formTransfer of Environmental Clearance for Building Stone, Sandstone, Quartzite, Ballast & Gitti Mining…
13 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtExpansion of Mirzapur Thermal Power Plant from 1600 (2x800) MW (Phase I) to 3200 MW by adding 1600 (2x800)…
13 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details supplied“Building Stone (Sandstone) Mine” at Gata No.- 997 Mi (01), Lease area- 2.23 ha., Village- Sindhaura,…
13 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmitted“Building stone, Sandstone, Quartizite, Ballast, Gitti”, at Gata No.- 997 Mi (04), Lease area- 3.00 ha.,…
10 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedResidential Township of Mirzapur Thermal Power Plant at Village Dadri Khurd, Tehsil Mirzapur Sadar,…
8 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtProposed Project of Building stone Sand Stone Mine of Smt. Vijeta Singh at Gata no. Gata no. 1006 (Area…
8 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed Project of Sand Stone Quartizite Ballast Gitti Mining Project at Gata no. 180/2, Area 1.010 ha in…

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 8
Forest land sought for diversion: Area not stated
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 1
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 391 of 391 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 180 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 391
Category A proposals: 13
Families declared displaced: None declared
Families declared affected: None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited. 1 of the proposals listed below declare displacement and are sited primarily in another district, so their figures are counted in that district’s total.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Uttar Pradesh, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 24,96,970
Households: 3,94,925
Average household size: 6.32; 1.47 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 0.8%; 7.7 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 26.5%; 9.8 points above IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 16.4%; 2.9 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 68.5%; 4.5 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 903; 39.9 below India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 8,81,996
Work participation rate: 35.3%; 4.5 points below IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 58.1%; 3.5 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 20.2%; 4.4 points below IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 37.9%; 8.0 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 39.1%; 14.4 points above IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 9.1%; 5.3 points above IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 38.1%; 8.1 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 24.2%; 0.1 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 57.1%; 5.3 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 7.6%; 0.7 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2023-Q12026-Q4

The timeline counts 198 of the 391 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 193, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. 4 of them cover periods for which we have read few filing dates so far, and they count only the proposals whose date we have. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 92.6%
Industrial Projects - 1 2.8%
River Valley and Hydroelectric Projects 2%
INFRA-2 1%
Other (2) 1.5%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 391 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 391 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from uttar-pradesh.json and madhya-pradesh.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.