← All districts

Senapati, Manipur

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 272

No proposal naming this district recorded a step between 30 Aug 2026 and 28 Oct 2026.

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared
0
Forest land sought for diversion
None declared
Wildlife board recommendation declared
0
In or near a protected area
0
In an eco-sensitive zone
0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 2 of 2 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 1 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district
2
Category A proposals
None
Families declared displaced
None declared
Families declared affected
None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Manipur, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply. A different protection does apply here: Article 371C and the Hill Areas Committee of the Legislative Assembly.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

  • Half or more of the people counted here in 2011 were Scheduled Tribe: 83.8%, against 8.55% nationally.

  • Cultivators and agricultural labourers make up 76% of workers here, against 55% nationally, so at least three in four people who work here do so on the land.

  • 2 clearance proposals name this district, where 84% of people are Scheduled Tribe and 76% of workers depend on the land.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population
3,57,124
Households
63,180
Average household size
5.65
0.80 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population
83.8%
75.3 points above IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population
0.3%
16.4 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6
13.5%
0.1 points below IndiaIndia
Literacy rate
66.8%
6.2 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio
949
6.80 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers
1,66,656
Work participation rate
46.7%
6.9 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land
76.3%
21.7 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators
70.3%
45.7 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers
6.0%
23.9 points below IndiaIndia
Marginal workers
22.1%
2.7 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers
2.6%
1.3 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land
21.2%
25.0 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
32.5%
8.2 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
4.0%
47.7 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households with a salaried member
15.6%
7.3 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2026-Q32026-Q3

The timeline counts 1 of the 2 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 1, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

  • Non-Coal Mining 50%
  • INFRA-2 50%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

  1. Category B2Proposal Accepted and Referred to SEAC2026-08-05

    SEKMAI VILLAGE QUARRYING LEASE OF SAND AND STONE

    TUNINDRO WAHENGBAM · Non-Coal Mining

  2. Category B2EC Granted2023-02-03

    Hospital Project - Shija Academy of Health Sciences to be developed by M/s Shija Hospitals and Research Institute Private Limited

    SHIJA HOSPITALS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE PRIVATE LIMITED · INFRA-2

All 2 proposals that name this district, newest first.