Kargil, LadakhCounted as part of Jammu & Kashmir in Census 2011, whose boundaries every figure here uses
Recent activity
All 0 in the last 60 daysNo proposal naming this district recorded a step between 30 Aug 2026 and 28 Oct 2026.
Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.
Other clearances these proposals declare
- Forest land diversion declared
- 0
- Forest land sought for diversion
- None declared
- Wildlife board recommendation declared
- 0
- In or near a protected area
- 0
- In an eco-sensitive zone
- 0
These counts are taken from the application forms of the 5 of 5 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 4 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.
- Proposals naming this district
- 5
- Category A proposals
- None
- Families declared displaced
- None declared
- Families declared affected
- None declared
Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.
Fifth Schedule status
Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area
No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Jammu & Kashmir, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply. A different protection does apply here: State land and forest-rights law; no Presidential Order under the Fifth Schedule extends here.
OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution
What the record shows
Half or more of the people counted here in 2011 were Scheduled Tribe: 86.9%, against 8.55% nationally.
Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.
Who lives there
Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.
- Total population
- 1,40,802
- Households
- 18,338
- Average household size
- 7.68
- 2.83 above India's 4.85India
- Scheduled Tribe share of population
- 86.9%
- 78.3 points above IndiaIndia
- Scheduled Caste share of population
- 0.0%
- 16.6 points below IndiaIndia
- Children aged 0-6
- 14.2%
- 0.6 points above IndiaIndia
- Literacy rate
- 71.3%
- 1.6 points below IndiaIndia
- Sex ratio
- 810
- 132.5 below India's 942.6India
What they live on
How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.
- Total workers
- 51,873
- Work participation rate
- 36.8%
- 2.9 points below IndiaIndia
- Workers dependent on land
- 23.2%
- 31.4 points below IndiaIndia
- Cultivators
- 15.9%
- 8.7 points below IndiaIndia
- Agricultural labourers
- 7.3%
- 22.7 points below IndiaIndia
- Marginal workers
- 44.2%
- 19.5 points above IndiaIndia
- Household industry workers
- 2.4%
- 1.5 points below IndiaIndia
How households live
Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.
- Rural households owning land
- 61.7%
- 15.5 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
- 49.8%
- 25.4 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
- 16.0%
- 35.8 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
- Rural households with a salaried member
- 32.9%
- 24.6 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
When these were filed
Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.
The timeline counts all 5 proposals here, since each one records the date it was first filed.
What kind of projects these are
The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.
- Non-Coal Mining 100%
The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.
What is proposed here
These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.
- Category B2Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2024-12-21
Minor Mineral Block Nallah Boulder Mining Project an area of 0.5028 ha at Village-Yokma Kharbo, Tehsil – Shakar District – Kargil, Ladakh (U.T) in favor of Mr. Haji Mohd Hassan Haidary S/O Mr. Haji Ghulam Hussain
MOHAMMAD HAIDARY · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2024-12-20
Minor Mineral Block Nallah Boulder Mining Project area of 1.25 ha at Village- Upper Khubathang, District – Kargil, Ladakh (U.T) in favor of Mr. Haji Mohd Hassan Haidary S/O Mr. Haji Ghulam Hussain
MOHAMMAD HAIDARY · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2024-12-19
Minor Mineral Block Nallah Boulder Mining Project an area of 0.5674 ha at Village-Skilmarchey Khachan, Tehsil – Sankoo District – Kargil, Ladakh (U.T) in favor of Mr. Haji Mohd Hassan Haidary S/O Mr. Haji Ghulam Hussain
MOHAMMAD HAIDARY · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2024-12-19
Minor Mineral Block Rock Debris Mining Project area of 0.75 ha at Village- Ashana Lanchi, Tehsil – Trespa, District – Kargil, Ladakh (U.T) in favor of Mr. Haji Mohd Hassan Haidary S/O Mr. Haji Ghulam Hussain
MOHAMMAD HAIDARY · Non-Coal Mining
- Category B2Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2023-07-31
Minor Mineral Block Nallah Boulder Muck an area of 1.25 ha; targeted Production capacity- 11,636 TPA (ROM), Minor Mineral Block Nallah Boulder Muck at Village- Upper Khubathang, District – Kargil, Ladakh (U.T)
MOHAMMAD HAIDARY · Non-Coal Mining
All 5 proposals that name this district, newest first.