← All districts

Dohad, Gujarat

Partly Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 485
  1. 19 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedCHANGEZKHAN MANSURKHAN PATHAN

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared
0
Forest land sought for diversion
None declared
Wildlife board recommendation declared
0
In or near a protected area
0
In an eco-sensitive zone
0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 15 of 15 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 7 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district
15
Category A proposals
None
Families declared displaced
None declared
Families declared affected
None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Partly within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

This district was carved from Panch Mahals in 1997, taking the Jhalod, Dohad, Limkheda and Deogarh Baria talukas the Order names. C.O. 109 fixes its area by reference to territorial divisions as existing at 31 December 1977, and a district drawn later does not change the ground the Order scheduled. The Order names part of Panch Mahals, and part of what it names now lies in this district, so district-level status cannot settle whether a particular site is inside it. The Ministry of Panchayati Raj lists this district among notified Fifth Schedule Areas.

OrderThe Scheduled Areas (States of Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa) Order, 1977 · C.O. 109, notified 1977-12-31

What the record shows

  • Half or more of the people counted here in 2011 were Scheduled Tribe: 74.3%, against 8.55% nationally.

  • Cultivators and agricultural labourers make up 83% of workers here, against 55% nationally, so at least three in four people who work here do so on the land.

  • Agricultural labourers, who work other people's land for wages, make up 44% of workers here. Compensation for acquired land is paid to those who hold title to it, so it does not reach them. They can still claim the rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR), because its section 3(c) counts a family whose livelihood depends on the land as an affected family, wherever that Act governs how the land is obtained.

  • Literacy was 58.8% in 2011 against 72.98% nationally, so notices and documents issued in writing during a consultation may reach fewer people here.

  • Part of this district is a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area. Acquiring land for a project sited in that part needs the Gram Sabha's prior consent under section 41(3) of RFCTLARR, and the district-level record cannot settle whether a particular site lies there.

  • 15 clearance proposals name this district, where 74% of people are Scheduled Tribe and 83% of workers depend on the land.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population
21,27,086
Households
3,34,272
Average household size
6.36
1.51 above India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population
74.3%
65.8 points above IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population
2.0%
14.7 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6
19.5%
5.9 points above IndiaIndia
Literacy rate
58.8%
14.2 points below IndiaIndia
Sex ratio
990
47.8 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers
9,99,124
Work participation rate
47.0%
7.2 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land
82.8%
28.2 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators
38.9%
14.3 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers
43.9%
14.0 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers
44.6%
19.9 points above IndiaIndia
Household industry workers
0.9%
2.9 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land
89.3%
43.2 points above IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
17.3%
7.0 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
15.0%
36.8 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

Rural households with a salaried member
4.6%
3.6 points below IndiaIndia

The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q32026-Q4

The timeline counts 12 of the 15 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 3, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. One of them covers a period for which we have read few filing dates so far, and it counts only the proposals whose date we have. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

  • Non-Coal Mining 93.3%
  • Coal Mining 6.7%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

  1. Category B2Under Examination2026-10-19

    CHANGEZKHAN MANSURKHAN PATHAN

    PATHAN CHANGEZKHAN MANSURKHAN · Non-Coal Mining

  2. Category B1Forwarded to MS SPCB/PCC by MS2026-02-24

    Shri Gamit Jenish. (Rama Block-02)

    YATIN PRAJAPATI · Non-Coal Mining

  3. Category B1Forwarded to MS SPCB/PCC by MS2026-01-24

    Shri Prital A. Vasava (Rama Ordinary Sand & Gravel - Block-03)

    vasava pritalkumar amarsinh · Non-Coal Mining

  4. Category B1Forwarded to MS SPCB/PCC by MS2026-01-21

    Shri Gamit Bhupendrakumar Dhansukhbhai (Rama Ordinary sand & Gravel - Block-04)

    GAMIT BHUPENDRAKUMAR DHANSUKHBHAI · Non-Coal Mining

  5. Category B2EC Granted2025-09-26

    Smt. Mansuri Faridaben Yusufbhai

    faridaben ysufbhai mansuri · Non-Coal Mining

  6. Category B2EC Granted2024-11-09

    NINAMA MINABEN RATNABHAI

    ninama minaben ratnabhai · Non-Coal Mining

  7. Category B2EC Granted2024-10-18

    SHRI SANGADA MARGI CHIRANGKUMAR

    CHIRAGKUMAR SANGADA · Coal Mining

  8. Category B2EC Granted2024-09-05

    Laxmanbhai Rupabhai Raval(Re-Appraisal) Lease Area-1.00.00,Vill- Bhathwada , Ta- Devgadhbaria ,Dist- Dahod

    LAXMANBHAI RUPABHI RAVAL · Non-Coal Mining

  9. Category B2EC Rejected2024-08-23

    Rameshbhai Hemabhai Beravat (Re-Appraisal) Lease Area-1.00.00 Ha. Vill: Borwani, Ta:Dahod, Dist:Dahod.

    rameshbhai hemabhai beravat · Non-Coal Mining

  10. Category B2EC Rejected2024-08-23

    Shri Virendrasinh Hemantsinh Beravat (Re-Appraisal) Lease Area-1.00.00 ha.Vill- Borwani Tal & Dist- Dahod (Gujarat).

    VIRENDRAKUMAR HEMANTSINH BERAVAT · Non-Coal Mining

  11. Category B2EC Rejected2024-08-08

    Khapriya Mineral Quartz Mine

    SIRAJ S KAPADIA · Non-Coal Mining

  12. Category B2EC Rejected2024-07-08

    Singavali Mineral Quartz Mine

    SIRAJ S KAPADIA · Non-Coal Mining

  13. Category B2EC Rejected2024-07-03

    Nalsai Mineral Quartz Mine

    sabbir s kapadia · Non-Coal Mining

  14. Category B2EC Granted2023-01-24

    Suthar Vasa Block -1

    NITESHKUMAR MORI · Non-Coal Mining

  15. Category B2EC Granted2022-09-23

    Borwani Block 1

    NITESHKUMAR MORI · Non-Coal Mining

All 15 proposals that name this district, newest first.