Navsari, Gujarat

Partly Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 490

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

22 Oct 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance grantedTRINETRA AERO-MARINE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
19 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtProposed Expansion Project for the Manufacturing of Chemical Fertilizers by M/s. Indian Potash Limited.
9 Oct 2026 · ClosedRecalledTRINETRA AERO-MARINE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
5 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtProposed 50 KLPD Molasses /Sugarcane Juice/Sugar Syrup/Sugar based Distillery Plant with 2.5 MW Captive…
24 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedDangar Dhaval Alabhai
24 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedNavalsang Laxmanbhai Parmar
14 Sept 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedProposed Nar Par Girna River Link Project
2 Sept 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed Expansion Project for the Manufacturing of Chemical Fertilizers by M/s. Indian Potash Limited.

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 1
Forest land sought for diversion: Area not stated
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 0
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 137 of 137 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 109 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 137
Category A proposals: 7
Families declared displaced: None declared
Families declared affected: None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Partly within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

This district was carved from Valsad in 1997, taking the Bansda and Chikhli talukas the Order names. C.O. 109 fixes its area by reference to territorial divisions as existing at 31 December 1977, and a district drawn later does not change the ground the Order scheduled. The Order names part of Valsad, and part of what it names now lies in this district, so district-level status cannot settle whether a particular site is inside it. The Ministry of Panchayati Raj lists this district among notified Fifth Schedule Areas.

OrderThe Scheduled Areas (States of Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa) Order, 1977 · C.O. 109, notified 1977-12-31

What the record shows

The Scheduled Tribe share here, 48.1%, is at least double the national figure of 8.55%.
Part of this district is a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area. Acquiring land for a project sited in that part needs the Gram Sabha's prior consent under section 41(3) of RFCTLARR, and the district-level record cannot settle whether a particular site lies there.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 13,29,672
Households: 2,95,131
Average household size: 4.51; 0.34 below India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 48.1%; 39.6 points above IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 2.7%; 14.0 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 10.2%; 3.4 points below IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 83.9%; 10.9 points above IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 961; 18.1 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 5,91,834
Work participation rate: 44.5%; 4.7 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 54.0%; 0.6 points below IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 19.1%; 5.6 points below IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 34.9%; 5.0 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 13.8%; 10.9 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 1.2%; 2.6 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 40.6%; 5.5 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 22.6%; 1.8 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 45.1%; 6.6 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 15.2%; 7.0 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2023-Q42026-Q3

The timeline counts 132 of the 137 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 5, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 82.5%
Industrial Projects - 3 6.6%
INFRA-2 5.8%
INFRA-1 2.9%
Other (2) 2.2%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 137 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 137 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from gujarat.json and maharashtra.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.