Belgaum, Karnataka

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 555

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

28 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedExpansion of Sugar Factory from 4,900 TCD to 15,000 TCD, Cogeneration Plant from 24 MW to 80 MW &…
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedLaterite Quarry Project,
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedAYURVEDIC HOSPITAL & COLLEGE BY M/S. DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR EDUCATION & SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST SOCIETY
27 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedExpansion of Sugar Factory from 4,900 TCD to 15,000 TCD, Cogeneration Plant from 24 MW to 80 MW &…
26 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtM/s Goral Stone Crusher Sri Ramesh P Goral
23 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedProposed Establishment of Sugarcane Crushing Plant of 5,000 TCD capacity, Co-gen power plant 25 MW and…
21 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtM/s S.C.Stone Industries Managing Proponent Sri Chandrakanth M Suppannavar Sri Suraj Supannavar
16 Oct 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance grantedProposed Expansion of Distillery From 60 KLPD to 360 KLPD And Captive Power Plant from 3 MW to 8 MW under…
12 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtOrdinary Building Stone Quarry "Sri. Girish Ningappa Golasheety"
11 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedM/s Goral Stone Crusher Sri Ramesh P Goral
9 Oct 2026 · Details soughtEssential details soughtEnvironment clearance for proposes to establish 200 KLPD distillery unit based on sugarcane juice/syrup/ C…
7 Oct 2026 · ClosedPulled back by the applicantShri. Shrikanth Appanna Roogi - Syno 167/3 (Part) Channapur Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belagavi District.…

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 5
Forest land sought for diversion: Area not stated
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 2
In or near a protected area: 0
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 240 of 240 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 128 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district: 240
Category A proposals: 36
Families declared displaced: None declared
Families declared affected: 602

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited. 1 of the proposals listed below declare displacement and are sited primarily in another district, so their figures are counted in that district’s total.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Karnataka, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 47,79,661
Households: 9,83,854
Average household size: 4.86; level with IndiaIndia
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 6.2%; 2.3 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 12.1%; 4.6 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 13.1%; 0.5 points below IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 73.5%; 0.5 points above IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 973; 30.0 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 21,05,668
Work participation rate: 44.1%; 4.3 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 64.7%; 10.1 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 33.8%; 9.2 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 30.9%; 0.9 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 17.6%; 7.1 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 2.9%; 0.9 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 55.0%; 8.9 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 24.0%; 0.4 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 31.8%; 20.0 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 9.2%; 0.9 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2023-Q22026-Q4

The timeline counts 172 of the 240 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 68, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. 3 of them cover periods for which we have read few filing dates so far, and they count only the proposals whose date we have. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 68.3%
Industrial Projects - 2 18.8%
INFRA-2 5%
Industrial Projects - 1 3.8%
Other (3) 4.2%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 240 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 240 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from karnataka.json and maharashtra.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.