← All districts

Wayanad, Kerala

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 590
  1. 3 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtGranite Building Stone Quarry of P V Devassykutty
  2. 18 Sept 2026 · DecidedEnvironmental clearance grantedGranite Building Stone Quarry of Wayanad Metals (Represented by its Managing Partner, M.M. Thomas)

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared
0
Forest land sought for diversion
None declared
Wildlife board recommendation declared
2
In or near a protected area
1
In an eco-sensitive zone
0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 12 of 12 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 4 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited.

Proposals naming this district
12
Category A proposals
None
Families declared displaced
None declared
Families declared affected
None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Kerala, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

  • The Scheduled Tribe share here, 18.5%, is at least double the national figure of 8.55%.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population
8,17,420
Households
1,90,894
Average household size
4.28
0.57 below India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population
18.5%
10.0 points above IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population
4.0%
12.7 points below IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6
11.3%
2.3 points below IndiaIndia
Literacy rate
89.0%
16.0 points above IndiaIndia
Sex ratio
1,035
92.4 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers
3,40,077
Work participation rate
41.6%
1.8 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land
45.4%
9.2 points below IndiaIndia
Cultivators
15.5%
9.1 points below IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers
29.9%
level with IndiaIndia
Marginal workers
22.5%
2.2 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers
1.3%
2.5 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land
not recorded
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month
not recorded
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour
not recorded
Rural households with a salaried member
not recorded

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2024-Q12026-Q2

The timeline counts 9 of the 12 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 3, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

  • Non-Coal Mining 66.7%
  • INFRA-2 25%
  • INFRA-1 8.3%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

  1. Category B2Referred to SEAC2026-05-11

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of Shiju E P

    SHIJU E P · Non-Coal Mining

  2. Category B1Proposal pulled back (withdrawn)2025-08-19

    Expansion of DM Education and Research Foundation

    DM EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION · INFRA-2

  3. Category B1EC Granted2024-12-30

    Expansion of DM Education and Research Foundation

    DM EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION · INFRA-2

  4. Category B2Referred to SEAC2024-09-26

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of P V Devassykutty

    palliyan varghese devassykutty · Non-Coal Mining

  5. Category B1Standard ToR Granted2024-05-24

    Expansion of DM Education and Research Foundation

    DM EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION · INFRA-2

  6. Category B2EC Granted2024-05-14

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of Shri. Joby John

    GRANITE BUILDING STONE QUARRY OF MR JOBY JOHN · Non-Coal Mining

  7. Category B1Withdrawal Request Accepted2024-03-22

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of M/s. Wayanad Metals

    MADATHINA THOMAS · Non-Coal Mining

  8. Category B2EC Granted2024-03-21

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of Wayanad Metals (Represented by its Managing Partner, M.M. Thomas)

    WAYANAD METALS · Non-Coal Mining

  9. Category B1EC Granted2024-01-16declares affected families

    Construction of Twin Tube Unidirectional Tunnel Road (2+2 Lane) with Four Lane Approach(from existing roads) for providing direct connectivity between Anakkampoyil-Kalladi -Meppadi in Kozhikode and Wayanad Districts of Kerala State

    EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS DIVISION, KOZHIKODE · INFRA-1

  10. Category B2EC Granted2023-08-17

    M/s Pulpally Stone Crushers

    MS PULPALLY STONE CRUSHERS · Non-Coal Mining

  11. Category B2EC Granted2023-08-10

    Granite Building Stone Quarry of M/s.Pulpally Stone Crushers

    MS PULPALLY STONE CRUSHERS · Non-Coal Mining

  12. Category B2EC Granted2023-03-01

    Proposed Granite Building Stone Quarry of M/s .Pulpally Stone Crushers

    MS PULPALLY STONE CRUSHERS · Non-Coal Mining

All 12 proposals that name this district, newest first.