Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu

Not a Scheduled AreaCensus 2011 district code 621

Follow in a feed reader Download all proposals (CSV)

Recent activity

26 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedGravel Quarry of Thiru. S. Manikandan
23 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtProposed Construction of Non-High rise Institutional Buildings
23 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedGravel Quarry of Thiru. K. Kamban
21 Oct 2026 · ClosedDelisted automaticallyProposed Construction of Non-High rise Institutional Buildings
21 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedThiru.S.Rameshbabu Gravel Quarry
16 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedGravel Quarry of Thiru. N. Sachithanantham
13 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedSittanavasal Village Rough Stone and Gravel Quarry Belongs to Miss. S. Niranjandevi
9 Oct 2026 · DecidedTerms of Reference grantedIrumbali Village Rough Stone Quarry Project Belongs to Thiru. Benet Antonyraj
9 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedRethinam- Lembalakudi- Rough Stone Quarry
8 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedRoughstone and Gravel Quarry of M/s.K.P.Stones
7 Oct 2026 · Details soughtAdditional details soughtThiru.P. Sabapathi Rough Stone and Gravel Quarry
1 Oct 2026 · FiledSubmittedThiru.P.Arumugam Rough stone and gravel quarry

Dated by the portal's own appraisal history, converted to India Standard Time; a proposal with no recorded history appears on its register submission date.

Other clearances these proposals declare

Forest land diversion declared: 0
Forest land sought for diversion: None declared
Wildlife board recommendation declared: 0
In or near a protected area: 1
In an eco-sensitive zone: 0

These counts are taken from the application forms of the 137 of 137 proposals naming this district whose forms have been read for these questions. In 77 of those forms at least one question was left blank, and a blank answer is counted as unknown. The forest area is the area stated for forest clearance, with each forest proposal counted once, in the district where its project is primarily sited. 2 proposals declare activity in a coastal regulation zone.

Proposals naming this district: 137
Category A proposals: 1
Families declared displaced: None declared
Families declared affected: None declared

Displacement figures are the proponents’ own declarations. A project sited across several districts declares one figure for the whole project, and that figure is counted once, in the district where the project is primarily sited.

Fifth Schedule status

Not within a Fifth Schedule Scheduled Area

No Presidential Order under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule declares any Scheduled Area in Tamil Nadu, so no part of this district is one and PESA does not apply.

OrderMinistry of Tribal Affairs, Scheduled Areas declared under paragraph 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution

What the record shows

Agricultural labourers, who work other people's land for wages, make up 40% of workers here. Compensation for acquired land is paid to those who hold title to it, so it does not reach them. They can still claim the rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR), because its section 3(c) counts a family whose livelihood depends on the land as an affected family, wherever that Act governs how the land is obtained.

Each of these observations appears when a fixed rule is met by the figures on this page, so the same figures always give the same sentences. None of them is a view on whether a project should go ahead.

Who lives there

Figures from Census 2011, each compared with the all-India value computed on the same definition.

Total population: 16,18,345
Households: 3,87,679
Average household size: 4.17; 0.68 below India's 4.85India
Scheduled Tribe share of population: 0.1%; 8.5 points below IndiaIndia
Scheduled Caste share of population: 17.6%; 1.0 points above IndiaIndia
Children aged 0-6: 11.1%; 2.5 points below IndiaIndia
Literacy rate: 77.2%; 4.2 points above IndiaIndia
Sex ratio: 1,015; 72.3 above India's 942.6India

What they live on

How the district's workers earn a living, from Census 2011. The land-dependent share counts cultivators and agricultural labourers as a share of all workers, and it is the group most directly affected when land is acquired.

Total workers: 7,61,693
Work participation rate: 47.1%; 7.3 points above IndiaIndia
Workers dependent on land: 67.5%; 13.0 points above IndiaIndia
Cultivators: 27.5%; 2.8 points above IndiaIndia
Agricultural labourers: 40.1%; 10.1 points above IndiaIndia
Marginal workers: 15.9%; 8.8 points below IndiaIndia
Household industry workers: 1.8%; 2.0 points below IndiaIndia

How households live

Land, income and work among rural households, from the Socio Economic and Caste Census 2011, which recorded these where the population census did not. Only the survey's rural part is used here, so urban households do not appear.

Rural households owning land: 39.3%; 6.8 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households whose highest earner makes over ₹5,000 a month: 17.2%; 7.1 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households living mainly on manual casual labour: 64.2%; 12.4 points above IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.
Rural households with a salaried member: 6.9%; 1.4 points below IndiaIndia
The India figure is computed from 614 of 640 districts, because the source table has no value for the others.

When these were filed

Each proposal is dated by the first step in its appraisal history, the dated record of steps the portal keeps for it.

2023-Q42026-Q4

The timeline counts 97 of the 137 proposals here. The first filing date comes from each proposal's appraisal history, and we have not yet read it for the other 40, so they are left out. Most of them are older proposals, so the early part of the timeline undercounts what was filed then. The register itself records a date for each of them; the gap is in our copy of the histories.

Hatched columns undercount, so they cannot be compared with solid ones. One of them covers a period for which we have read few filing dates so far, and it counts only the proposals whose date we have. 2026-Q4 was still running when the register was read, so its column counts only the filings made up to that date.

What kind of projects these are

The proposals naming this district, grouped by the sector each was filed under.

Non-Coal Mining 94.2%
INFRA-2 2.9%
Industrial Projects - 2 1.5%
Industrial Projects - 1 0.7%
Other (1) 0.7%

The four largest sectors are shown by name and the rest are grouped as Other.

What is proposed here

These are the proposals in the national environmental clearance register whose application names a site in this district, newest first. A project with sites in several districts appears under each of them.

Showing 100 of 137 proposals, newest first. The button below loads the rest.

Showing the first 100 of 137 proposals. The rest load in the browser, and with scripting turned off they can be read from tamil-nadu.json under /data/instruments/consent/projects/.